🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.