🔗 Share this article

Keir Starmer is facing backbench anger after ministers scrapped intentions to provide employees immediate safeguards against wrongful termination, a change breaking the party's election pledges.

MPs Voice Concerns

Parliamentarians such as an ex-government official who spearheaded the employment rights bill have voiced concerns regarding the retreat announced by the government.

Government officials have eliminated the plan to scrap the 24-month eligibility timeframe for workers to make an unfair dismissal claim and allow them to do so starting immediately in a new job, to facilitate passing the proposed law through government.

Legislative Deadlock

The proposal found itself in a dispute involving upper and lower chambers regarding the initial proposal to offer labor protections on day one, as well as measures to ban "exploitative" zero-hours contracts.

Ministers currently plan to establish the protection regarding wrongful termination after six months of service as an alternative, although additional first-day entitlements to parental leave and illness compensation remain scheduled to move forward, taking effect in spring 2026.

Opposition and Condemnation

The Labour MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East described the move as a "total abandonment" and pledged to advocate for its reversal.

"We are unable to endorse that compromise solution."

"This is a wrong-headed move and I will campaign to overturn this compromise."

An additional parliamentarian shared concern regarding insufficient discussion, remarking: "There has been zero consultation with the PLP. The upper chamber lacks authority concerning campaign pledges, therefore why did we surrender??"

Wider Consequences

An additional lawmaker remarked: "Employers have nothing to fear regarding first-day entitlements, however laborers face significant risks from businesses who doesn't want day-one rights."

The previous work and pensions official asserted that the decision "undoubtedly constitutes a manifesto breach."

Ministerial Explanation

The education secretary declared remained a "substantial likelihood" the enactment of the employment rights bill could have experienced setbacks had the administration not implemented a reversal concerning day one protections against unjust firing.

"Dialogue has taken place on the point around unfair dismissal and the time period with employers, the TUC and ministers, and after those talks there's been agreement concerning future direction, which is welcome."

The minister stressed that "It means that the time limit will come down from two years to six months, and that runs alongside crucial immediate protections around sick pay and about family time off."

"But the risk here was without forward movement, those crucial protections might not be implemented starting spring 2026."

Upon being asked regarding if it constituted a broken promise, the official replied: "In the manifesto, the promise indicated was that we intended to collaborate with trade unions, with business, with civil society, in consulting on these safeguards we intended to implement."

"Therefore, two components exist regarding that matter, throughout the campaign document, the crucial protections and the dialogue."